Post by account_disabled on Feb 27, 2024 6:23:44 GMT -5
Return policy reveals, per se , a stronger redistributive character, with an improvement in the well-being of the most vulnerable classes. In other words, any extinction of benefits must necessarily be accompanied by a mechanism that makes it possible to achieve an ideal of contributory capacity, as a fundamental right of low-income consumers, under penalty of being unconstitutional. This point even leads us to a second type of concern: the fact that none of the proposed texts address devolution as a mandatory measure, with a constitutional basis, limiting itself to delegating the normative design to a future complementary law and/or even link restitution to an income transfer policy, possibly along the lines of social programs that currently exist.
As stated above, such return should not be confused with any income transfer policy; It is an intrinsic counterpart to the eventual end of the policy of selective rates and, for this reason, it should not only be provided for in the reforming constitutional norm, but also safe from any form of contingency or budget restriction. In fact, devolution should not even be part of the Chinese Europe Phone Number List disputes taking place during the drafting of the budget law, a field of political influences that will be overloaded with the announced end of the various differentiated tax regimes [3] . Said refund must be immediate and unconditional, characteristics that are also not expressly included in the proposals under discussion.
The reason for such concerns is simple and, coincidentally, it is on the agenda, since the government elected in the last presidential election has encountered resistance to the removal of social spending from the budget spending ceiling, including the proposal of a new PEC, specifically aimed at the transition, receiving harsh criticism from those who defend a policy of fiscal austerity [4] . Imagine the hypothesis that the refund of IBS would suffer the same type of restrictions: what would low-income families be like with the increase in the cost of living caused by the taxation of basic necessities without the express constitutional guarantee of effective refund? It is never too much to remember that, in addition to discussing the best way to combat the regressive nature of consumption taxation, tax relief policies in the production chain for items included in the basic food basket fulfill the important role of reducing costs in the acquisition of these items.
As stated above, such return should not be confused with any income transfer policy; It is an intrinsic counterpart to the eventual end of the policy of selective rates and, for this reason, it should not only be provided for in the reforming constitutional norm, but also safe from any form of contingency or budget restriction. In fact, devolution should not even be part of the Chinese Europe Phone Number List disputes taking place during the drafting of the budget law, a field of political influences that will be overloaded with the announced end of the various differentiated tax regimes [3] . Said refund must be immediate and unconditional, characteristics that are also not expressly included in the proposals under discussion.
The reason for such concerns is simple and, coincidentally, it is on the agenda, since the government elected in the last presidential election has encountered resistance to the removal of social spending from the budget spending ceiling, including the proposal of a new PEC, specifically aimed at the transition, receiving harsh criticism from those who defend a policy of fiscal austerity [4] . Imagine the hypothesis that the refund of IBS would suffer the same type of restrictions: what would low-income families be like with the increase in the cost of living caused by the taxation of basic necessities without the express constitutional guarantee of effective refund? It is never too much to remember that, in addition to discussing the best way to combat the regressive nature of consumption taxation, tax relief policies in the production chain for items included in the basic food basket fulfill the important role of reducing costs in the acquisition of these items.