Post by account_disabled on Mar 6, 2024 22:22:35 GMT -5
Dissatisfied with what happened and analyzing the requirement that she had to pay in cash at her expense, after discovering that she was working without a work permit and after six months without regularizing her administrative situation in poor working conditions, the worker informed the management that “we will not work anymore until they give me permission.” The next day the worker did not go to work, but later went to her workplace to clarify her conditions, having been working for six months without authorization following false promises from the company.
That day an argument occurred, which is being investigated before the Provincial Court of Malaga, which led to her dismissal. From this perspective, they analyze the case and it is Fax Lists found that the worker had made several internal claims that could suggest that the principle of the worker's indemnity guarantee was being violated (art. 24 EC) as the company's reaction was the dismissal, after insistent complaints, to avoid a later problem with the Labor and Social Security Inspection. Thus, all the documentation provided by the worker is analyzed, being relevant to the resolution of the case that the worker had recorded the discussion held on the day of her dismissal, which could show both the length of service she had been working and that she had been fired for insisting in regularizing their administrative situation.
It is from this perspective that Ms. Fei filed a lawsuit requesting the declaration of nullity of the dismissal combined with the action for violation of fundamental rights and the recognition of the employment relationship. Aim. Question raised. A ruling is issued recognizing the employment relationship claimed from May 20, 2022 to November 20, 2022; the annulment of the dismissal that occurred on November 20, 2022; the violation of fundamental rights with the payment of the compensation calculated by this part, as well as the payment of the amounts owed to date (salaries, social security contributions, overtime, vacations, etc.), as well as all those amounts owed, with the corresponding legal interest for said declaration.
That day an argument occurred, which is being investigated before the Provincial Court of Malaga, which led to her dismissal. From this perspective, they analyze the case and it is Fax Lists found that the worker had made several internal claims that could suggest that the principle of the worker's indemnity guarantee was being violated (art. 24 EC) as the company's reaction was the dismissal, after insistent complaints, to avoid a later problem with the Labor and Social Security Inspection. Thus, all the documentation provided by the worker is analyzed, being relevant to the resolution of the case that the worker had recorded the discussion held on the day of her dismissal, which could show both the length of service she had been working and that she had been fired for insisting in regularizing their administrative situation.
It is from this perspective that Ms. Fei filed a lawsuit requesting the declaration of nullity of the dismissal combined with the action for violation of fundamental rights and the recognition of the employment relationship. Aim. Question raised. A ruling is issued recognizing the employment relationship claimed from May 20, 2022 to November 20, 2022; the annulment of the dismissal that occurred on November 20, 2022; the violation of fundamental rights with the payment of the compensation calculated by this part, as well as the payment of the amounts owed to date (salaries, social security contributions, overtime, vacations, etc.), as well as all those amounts owed, with the corresponding legal interest for said declaration.